• Skip to content

Art of Seeing

In Studio with Masters

  • About
  • Sonnets in colour
  • Sign up

On Claude Monet’s Studio Boat and Futility of Goals

February 13, 2018 by Elena Maslova-Levin

Claude Monet. The Studio Boat. 1876.

You’ve got to have goals, they say. Smart, well-defined goals.

“If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know that you HAVE ARRIVED?”


The morning of my eighth birthday was warm and sunny, unusual for mid-April in St. Petersburg (then Leningrad). The first warm day after a long, cold winter.

I went out, and sensed the warm touch of sunshine and the cool touch of breeze on my left cheek, both within a single moment. And this unexpected contrast suddenly changed the whole world around me. The time slowed down, the noise of the city faded away, and everything felt just perfectly perfect.

I stood there, within this perfect moment, and knew, with absolute certainty, that I HAVE ARRIVED.


Last week, in our small group for conversations about paintings, we contemplated Monet’s Studio Boat.

We meet in this new NOWHERE of virtual space, in the NO-WHEN of randomly scattered time zones. Just to look at paintings — at reproductions hanging in (on?) another nowhere. Or is it the same one?

These conversations have the same perfectly goal-less, agenda-less quality as that warm morning of my childhood, in the sacred, mysterious space created and held for us by a painting. The space for peak experiences.


And this painting, as though still in-progress after more than a century of hectic, goal-driven activities of humankind that drives itself towards ever-increasing productivity and ever-increasing busyness… — as though Time has stopped within the painting process, and within the moment being painted.

It embodies the same goal-less quality in all its dimensions of being — from the boat designed not to go anywhere, to the unfinished areas of the picture plane.


I have no quarrels with goals, but if you always know where you are going, doesn’t the journey become a bit boring?

 

 

Filed Under: Art and life, In Museum Tagged With: Claude Monet

Receive new essays by e-mail

Other recent essays

Deep and utterly shallow green: mysteries of color composition

November 4, 2017 By Elena Maslova-Levin

This is how Rilke describes van Gogh’s “The Night Cafe” (“Letters on Cézanne”, October 17, 1907): … artificial wakefulness in wine red, lamp yellow, deep and utterly shallow green, with three mirrors, each of which contains a different emptiness Deep and utterly shallow green — sounds like a paradox, an oxymoron even. And it captures perfectly […]

On the strength of a single contradiction… (Van Gogh’s “Pietà after Delacroix”)

October 8, 2017 By Elena Maslova-Levin

This essay’s title, “on the strength of a single contradiction” comes from one of Rilke’s “Letters on Cézanne” (from October 21, 1907). He writes: … There’s something else I wanted to say about Cézanne: that no one before him ever demonstrated so clearly the extent to which painting is something that takes place among the […]

The artist is present (Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin on man’s glassy essence)

September 29, 2017 By Elena Maslova-Levin

But man, proud man, Dress’d in a little brief authority, Most ignorant of what he’s most assured —
 His glassy essence… William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure What is often called “realistic paintings” are paintings that do not challenge the conventional sense of vision. There is nothing strange or unexpected: things are depicted exactly like we […]

Related essays

  • The artist is present (Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin on man’s glassy essence)
  • Neither flesh nor fleshless (Pierre-Auguste Renoir at the still point of the turning world)
  • Pavel Filonov on “headless” state of consciousness

Reader Interactions

Copyright © 2025 · Atmosphere Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • About
  • Contact